GANESH K. GULVE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — Crl.A. No. 501/1999

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010065131999

Filing Date

17-Apr-1999

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 501/1999

Diary Number

6513/1999

Order Date

21-Aug-2002

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANESH K. GULVE

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Aug-2002

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 08-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Jul-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-May-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 17-Apr-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 501/1999

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ganesh K. Gulve v. State of Maharashtra Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals, upholding the High Court's conviction of Ganesh K. Gulve and 10 other accused for murder and unlawful assembly under IPC Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 452 read with Section 149. The Court found that the High Court correctly reversed the trial court's acquittal of Gulve, as positive evidence established his prominent role in the mob that murdered three family members and injured others on September 7, 1991. Key Reasoning: Though the trial court acquitted Gulve citing witness inconsistencies, the High Court found consistent testimony from all material witnesses about his presence and specific overt acts (challenging victims, assaulting them, throwing an axe). The Court held minor variations in witness accounts insignificant given the broad daylight attack with multiple injured family witnesses present, and rejected claims that medical evidence contradicted the assault allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case