U.P.S.R.T.C. . vs SANJIDA BANO . — C.A. No. 1540/2005

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010064952004

Filing Date

22-Mar-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 1540/2005

Diary Number

6495/2004

Order Date

04-Mar-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U.P.S.R.T.C. .

    Adv. PRADEEP MISRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJIDA BANO .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 31-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Mar-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1540/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 001540/2005 (U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Sanjida Bano) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed U.P.S.R.T.C.'s appeal and set aside the High Court's order dated March 4, 2004. The Court held that respondents could not obtain temporary permits under Section 104 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the State Transport Undertaking had already applied for and was operating permits on the Lucknow-Kursi-Tikaitganj notified route (36-40 trips). The proviso allowing temporary permits applies only when no State Transport application exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case