JANARDHAN WAMAN SARODE vs ARUN RAU PAWAR — C.A. No. 5265/2012
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010064702004
Filing Date
22-Mar-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 5265/2012
Diary Number
6470/2004
Order Date
17-Jan-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JANARDHAN WAMAN SARODE
Adv. ANAGHA S. DESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARUN RAU PAWAR
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
14-Dec-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
13-Dec-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
29-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
23-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
22-Nov-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
09-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
08-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
31-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
26-Oct-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
05-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
12-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
07-Sep-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
09-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
03-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
01-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
20-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
19-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
13-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
-
12-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5265/2012
Summary: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court of Bombay's September 30, 2003 judgment and remanded the matter back to the High Court with directions to pass appropriate orders on Civil Application No. 3001 of 2003 in accordance with law. The issue was that the High Court had failed to pass any order—either allowing or rejecting—on the appellant's application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the CPC to take additional evidence on record, though it mentioned the application in its judgment. The Court clarified it expressed no opinion on the merits regarding admissibility of the additional evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts