S.NAGARATHNA vs BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . — C.A. No. 3778/2011

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010063302008

Filing Date

03-Mar-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 3778/2011

Diary Number

6330/2008

Order Date

29-Apr-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.NAGARATHNA

    Adv. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .

    Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VIJAY KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 09-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 13-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 28-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 15-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 03-Mar-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3778/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S. Nagarathna v. Bangalore Development Authority (C.A. 3778/2011) On 29 April 2011, the Supreme Court allowed S. Nagarathna's appeal against the High Court's Division Bench judgment dated 11 December 2007. The Court directed Bangalore Development Authority to refund the appellant's deposited amount with 6% interest within two months. The Division Bench order was set aside and the Single Judge's order was restored, though without precedential value. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case