BHIM BATI vs STATE OF HARYANA — Crl.A. No. 2760/2026

Case under 1511Ab-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Anticipatory Bail Applications.) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010631712025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2760/2026

Diary Number

63171/2025

Order Date

22-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511AB-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of anticipatory bail applications.) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIM BATI

    Adv. AABHAS KSHETARPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

    Adv. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-1] ANIL KUMAR[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 13-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2760/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhim Bati v. State of Haryana The Supreme Court allowed Bhim Bati and others' criminal appeal challenging the High Court's rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a fraud case (FIR No. 138/2024, Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC). Finding the offences arose from civil transactions with a settlement reached at Lok Adalat, the Court granted anticipatory bail to appellants (except appellant no. 3 who was arrested) subject to Rs. 25,000 cash security each with two sureties, directing complete cooperation in trial and prohibiting witness intimidation or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case