GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. THROUGH ITS SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER LEGAL AND SECRETARIAL vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 6178/2009
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010062952004
Filing Date
19-Mar-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 6178/2009
Diary Number
6295/2004
Order Date
18-Jul-2017
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 635
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. THROUGH ITS SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER LEGAL AND SECRETARIAL
Adv. GAGRAT AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jul-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2017
Not Taken Up
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
13-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6178/2009
-
[ 2017 INSC 635 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union of India Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court judgment, holding that Glaxo Smithkline can charge non-DPCO-controlled prices for drugs manufactured during the exemption period (until 31 December 1994), even if sold after that date. Key Reasoning: The court interpreted Paragraph 28 of the Drugs (Prices Control) Order 1987 to mean that price control exemptions relate to manufacture, not sale. Since the exemption applied to goods manufactured by 31 December 1994, the company could thereafter charge unilaterally-determined prices uncontrolled by government price fixation, rejecting the government's demand for Rs. 2.04 crores in allegedly overcharged amounts from post-exemption sales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts