UNION OF INDIA . vs M/S. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION — CURATIVE PET(C) No. 345 - 347/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010601722010

Filing Date

22-Dec-2010

Registration No

CURATIVE PET(C) No. 345 - 347/2010

Diary Number

60172/2010

Order Date

14-Mar-2023

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2023 INSC 222

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. APARNA BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL[P-1] ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION

    Adv. BINA GUPTA[R-4] SHIRAZ CONTRACTOR PATODIA BINA GUPTA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2023

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  5. 12-Jan-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  7. 11-Jan-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  9. 10-Jan-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  11. 11-Oct-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Oct-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  13. 20-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  15. 29-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Jan-2020

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran, Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  17. 28-Jan-2020

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran, Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  18. 28-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 28-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 11-Jul-2014
  21. 29-Apr-2014
  22. 21-Feb-2014
  23. 29-Nov-2013
  24. 28-Oct-2013
  25. 03-Oct-2013
  26. 13-Sep-2013
  27. 03-Sep-2012
  28. 13-Aug-2012
  29. 28-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 24-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 22-Dec-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. CURATIVE PET(C) No. 345 - 347/2010

  32. [ 2023 INSC 222 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Union of India v. Union Carbide Corporation, Curative Petition No. 345-347/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's curative petitions seeking to increase the 1989 Bhopal Gas Disaster settlement from US $470 million, holding that the settlement was valid and adequate. The Court rejected the Union's argument that incorrect victim numbers and injury data vitiated the settlement, finding instead that excess settlement funds had been distributed to claimants and that reopening the 19-year-old settlement would violate principles of finality without legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case