KULDEEP KAUR vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 3347 - 3380/2011
Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010005932011
Filing Date
09-03-2011 12:00 AM
Registration No
C.A. No. 3347 - 3380/2011
Diary Number
593/2011
Order Date
08-12-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KULDEEP KAUR
Adv. RITESH KHATRI[P-22] RITESH KHATRI[P-13] RITESH KHATRI[P-14] RITESH KHATRI[P-15] NARESH BAKSHI[P-19] RITESH KHATRI[P-24] RITESH KHATRI[P-25] RITESH KHATRI[P-26] RITESH KHATRI[P-27] RITESH KHATRI[P-28] RITESH KHATRI[P-30] RITESH KHATRI[P-31] NARESH BAKSHI[P-5] NARESH BAKSHI[P-17] RITESH KHATRI[P-12] RITESH KHATRI[P-11] RITESH KHATRI[P-10] TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-7] TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-6] NARESH BAKSHI[P-23] NARESH BAKSHI[P-21] NARESH BAKSHI[P-20] RITESH KHATRI[P-1] RITESH KHATRI[P-2] RITESH KHATRI[P-3] RITESH KHATRI[P-4] RITESH KHATRI[P-8] RITESH KHATRI[P-9] NARESH BAKSHI[P-18]
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY
Adv. AJAY PAL[R-2] AJAY PAL[R-5] ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-21] ANNAM VENKATESH[R-9] ANNAM VENKATESH[R-8] ANNAM VENKATESH[R-4] ANNAM VENKATESH[R-21] ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-9] ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-8] ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] AJAY PAL[R-6]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
Ordinary
Ordinary
Administrative Order
After Week/Month/Vacation
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-12-2022 | Ordinary |
| 07-12-2022 | Ordinary |
| 14-10-2022 | Administrative Order |
| 10-02-2022 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 08-12-2021 | Ordinary |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: Kuldeep Kaur v. Union of India (C.A. 3347-3380/2011) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court's dismissal of the land owners' appeals for non-prosecution. The Court restored the Regular First Appeals to the High Court for fresh adjudication on merits, finding that the High Court should have adopted a pragmatic approach rather than dismissing the appeals due to counsel's non-appearance. Next Steps: Parties directed to appear before the High Court on 16 January 2023. The Supreme Court requested the High Court decide the restored appeals expeditiously. Background: Land owners' appeals challenging compensation (Rs.1780/marla awarded by Reference Court) for 246 kanal 15 marla acquired by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited were dismissed for non-prosecution when newly-engaged counsel failed to appear on 20 July 2010, though engaged a week prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts