STATE OF A.P. vs VINNAKOTA LAXMI SUNDARI — C.A. No. 7005/2004

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010056852003

Filing Date

11-Mar-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 7005/2004

Diary Number

5685/2003

Order Date

29-Oct-2004

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF A.P.

    Adv. MOHANPRASAD MEHARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINNAKOTA LAXMI SUNDARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Oct-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Sep-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 26-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Sep-2003
  14. 08-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Sep-2003
  16. 21-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 10-Jul-2003
  18. 08-May-2003
  19. 05-May-2003
  20. 25-Apr-2003
  21. 11-Mar-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7005/2004

  22. 28-Feb-2003
  23. 27-Jan-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 13-Jan-2003
  25. 20-Dec-2002
  26. 02-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 27-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 7005/2004 The Supreme Court allowed the State of A.P.'s appeal against the High Court's order that had set aside the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal's decision to condone delay in filing appeals relating to agricultural land ceiling declarations. The Court held that the High Court wrongly interfered with the Tribunal's discretionary order and restored the Tribunal's order, directing it to hear the appeals on their merits expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case