KALPANA P. SHAH . vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — SLP(C) No. 7832/2005

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010056282005

Filing Date

10-Mar-2005

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 7832/2005

Diary Number

5628/2005

Order Date

30-Jan-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPANA P. SHAH .

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

    Adv. BHARGAVA V. DESAI TARA CHANDRA SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PURNIMA BHAT SHIVAJI M. JADHAV ASHA GOPALAN NAIR CHIRAG M. SHROFF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 27-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 10-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 18-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 17-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 10-Mar-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 7832/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed Kalpana P. Shah's Special Leave Petition challenging the High Court of Bombay's October 28, 2004 order. The Court condoned the delay in filing and upheld the High Court's decision, but allowed the petitioners to make representations to MHADA if they paid the entire amount demanded by MHADA plus all dues accumulated till the hearing date; MHADA would then consider their grievance and pass appropriate orders accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case