M.N. JEYARAJ vs B. SUBHASH CHANDRAN — SLP(C) No. 9157/2026

Case under Family Laws : Succession, Inheritance, Devolution of Property, Gift, Partition Amongst Family Members Section XII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010005522026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9157/2026

Diary Number

552/2026

Order Date

26-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Laws : Succession, Inheritance, devolution of property, gift, partition amongst family members Section XII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.N. JEYARAJ

    Adv. G. BALAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B. SUBHASH CHANDRAN

    Adv. B. KARUNAKARAN[R-1] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-3] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-4] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-5] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-6] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-9]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  4. 14-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  6. 11-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court admitted the Special Leave Petition filed by M.N. Jeyaraj & Ors. challenging the Madras High Court's October 10, 2025 judgment in Appeal Suit No. 677/2014, condoning the delay in refiling. The Court issued notice to respondents returnable on April 6, 2026, with Dasti service permitted and service to be completed within one week. Respondents must file counter affidavits before the next hearing, and status quo regarding the suit property's nature, possession, and title must be maintained by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case