RUKMINI AMMA . vs RAJESWARY & DEAD THROUGH LRS.. — C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010005362003
Filing Date
07-Jan-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005
Diary Number
536/2003
Order Date
22-Mar-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUKMINI AMMA .
Adv. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESWARY & DEAD THROUGH LRS..
Adv. R. NEDUMARAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) M. J. PAUL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005
Case Summary: Rukmini Amma v. Rajeswary (C.A. No. 1475-1476/2005) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeals, setting aside the High Court and First Appellate Court judgments and restoring the Trial Court's decision dismissing the redemption suit. The Court held that a revenue sale of mortgaged property for the mortgagor's agricultural income tax liability extinguished the mortgagor's redemption rights, as agricultural income tax is a personal liability of the land owner, not a "Government due" on the property itself that the mortgagee was obligated to pay under the mortgage deed. Key Finding: Agricultural income tax liability cannot be treated as a statutory charge on the mortgaged land requiring the mortgagee to clear it; it is the mortgagor's personal tax obligation based on income earned, distinguishable from property-related government dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts