RUKMINI AMMA . vs RAJESWARY & DEAD THROUGH LRS.. — C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010005362003

Filing Date

07-Jan-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005

Diary Number

536/2003

Order Date

22-Mar-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUKMINI AMMA .

    Adv. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESWARY & DEAD THROUGH LRS..

    Adv. R. NEDUMARAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) M. J. PAUL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 17-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1475 - 1476/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rukmini Amma v. Rajeswary (C.A. No. 1475-1476/2005) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeals, setting aside the High Court and First Appellate Court judgments and restoring the Trial Court's decision dismissing the redemption suit. The Court held that a revenue sale of mortgaged property for the mortgagor's agricultural income tax liability extinguished the mortgagor's redemption rights, as agricultural income tax is a personal liability of the land owner, not a "Government due" on the property itself that the mortgagee was obligated to pay under the mortgage deed. Key Finding: Agricultural income tax liability cannot be treated as a statutory charge on the mortgaged land requiring the mortgagee to clear it; it is the mortgagor's personal tax obligation based on income earned, distinguishable from property-related government dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case