M/S. ANAND NISHIKAWA COMPANY LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT — C.A. No. 3158/2000

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010052602000

Filing Date

27-Mar-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 3158/2000

Diary Number

5260/2000

Order Date

23-Sep-2005

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ANAND NISHIKAWA COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. M. P. DEVANATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT

    Adv. P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Sep-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Mar-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3158/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003158/2000: Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the extended five-year limitation period under Section 11A's proviso was not available to the revenue authorities. The court found no "suppression of facts" by the manufacturer regarding rubber profile classification, as the excise department had inspected the products, collected samples, and continuously approved the classification lists, while a manufacturing flow-chart mentioning post-forming processes was submitted in 1990. Accordingly, the demand was restricted to six months prior to the October 1995 show cause notice instead of five years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case