AGRICULTURE MARKETING DIRECTORATE,JAIPUR vs RAM PRATAP — C.A. No. 3289/2014
Case under Section XV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010049942006
Filing Date
22-Feb-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 3289/2014
Diary Number
4994/2006
Order Date
05-Mar-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AGRICULTURE MARKETING DIRECTORATE,JAIPUR
Adv. P. V. YOGESWARAN
Respondent(s)
RAM PRATAP
Adv. SURYA KANT
Orders
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003289/2014 The Supreme Court dismissed the Agriculture Marketing Directorate's appeals challenging pension entitlements for respondent employees. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that Rule 10(2) of the Pension Rules was unconstitutional as it discriminated based on provident fund contributions. The Court held respondents' appointments were valid and regular against sanctioned posts, and their continuous service from initial appointment in the State Agriculture Department qualified them for pension and gratuity. The Court directed appellants to pay Rs. 5,000 costs to each respondent, deeming the litigation unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts