KANGARO INDUSTRIES (REGD) vs JAININDER JAIN — C.A. No. 5007/2008
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010049832007
Filing Date
15-Feb-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 5007/2008
Diary Number
4983/2007
Order Date
06-Apr-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Data as of 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANGARO INDUSTRIES (REGD)
Adv. VERNIKA TOMAR
Respondent(s)
JAININDER JAIN
Adv. KAMLENDRA MISHRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-Apr-2022 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 05-Apr-2022 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 29-Sep-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 20-Apr-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 20-Apr-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Case Summary: Kangaro Industries v. Jaininder Jain (CA No. 5007/2008) The Supreme Court allowed Kangaro Industries' appeal, setting aside interim orders passed by the Delhi High Court's Single Judge (dated October 10, 2006 and December 18, 2006) in a contempt petition. The Court held that the Single Judge improperly enlarged the scope of relief in contempt jurisdiction beyond what was granted in the original 1997 status quo order, which was limited to the registered trademark "KANGARO" in India. However, the Court clarified that the respondent-plaintiff remains free to pursue other appropriate remedies, including anti-suit injunctions or other proceedings on their merits, leaving all substantive contentions open for resolution in the pending main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts