MAJEDA BIBI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 154/2013
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010048532005
Filing Date
01-Mar-2005
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 154/2013
Diary Number
4853/2005
Order Date
14-Sep-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAJEDA BIBI
Adv. IRSHAD AHMAD[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
13-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
12-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
13-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
06-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
17-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2005
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 154/2013
CASE SUMMARY: Crl.A. No. 154/2013 - MAJEDA BIBI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the complainant (mother of deceased Ahamadullah) and the State against the High Court's acquittal of eight accused persons charged with murder under IPC Sections 148, 302, and 34. The High Court found serious infirmities in witness testimonies, contradictions between the complainant's statement and supporting witnesses, mismatches with medical evidence, and suspicious parental behavior (parents failed to rescue their son allegedly thrown alive into a pond), concluding guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal, holding that appellate courts cannot overturn High Court factual findings where evidence analysis supports acquittal, even if alternative interpretations exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts