KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, KOTA vs ATRIVEER SINGH PATHAK . — C.A. No. 3292/2014

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010047842006

Filing Date

20-Feb-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 3292/2014

Diary Number

4784/2006

Order Date

05-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, KOTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATRIVEER SINGH PATHAK .

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Jan-2014
  6. 24-Sep-2013
  7. 26-Aug-2013
  8. 12-Aug-2013
  9. 16-Jul-2013
  10. 12-Jul-2013
  11. 15-Apr-2013
  12. 18-Mar-2013
  13. 30-Nov-2012
  14. 31-Aug-2012
  15. 21-Aug-2012
  16. 08-May-2012
  17. 10-Apr-2012
  18. 22-Mar-2012
  19. 25-Jan-2012
  20. 02-Dec-2011
  21. 14-Oct-2011
  22. 23-Sep-2011
  23. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 11-Jul-2011
  25. 05-Jul-2011
  26. 13-Apr-2011
  27. 23-Feb-2011
  28. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 16-Jul-2010
  31. 06-May-2010
  32. 16-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 05-Apr-2010
  34. 23-Feb-2010
  35. 08-Feb-2010
  36. 27-Jan-2010
  37. 27-Nov-2009
  38. 13-Nov-2009
  39. 07-Sep-2009
  40. 17-Aug-2009
  41. 12-Aug-2009
  42. 03-Aug-2009
  43. 15-Jul-2009
  44. 09-Jul-2009
  45. 16-Jun-2009
  46. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 16-Jan-2009
  48. 12-Jan-2009
  49. 01-Sep-2008
  50. 30-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 14-Mar-2008
  52. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 15-Feb-2008
  54. 24-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 19-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 17-Sep-2007
  57. 07-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 27-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 24-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 17-Apr-2006
  62. 03-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 20-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 20-Feb-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3292/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 003292/2014 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all consolidated appeals filed by the Agriculture Marketing Directorate, Jaipur. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that employees absorbed from the State Agriculture Department into the Marketing Board were entitled to pension counting service from their original appointment dates, striking down Rule 10(2) of the Pension Rules as unconstitutional. The Court directed appellants to pay ₹5,000 costs to each respondent. Key Finding: Employees' service conditions were protected under bye-laws; hence they could claim pension benefits for the entire period of continuous service, regardless of when provident fund contributions began. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case