THE STATE OF BENGAL STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. SECRETARY vs SK. MOJAMMEL HAQUE — SLP(C) No. 8562/2013

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010047042013

Filing Date

11-Feb-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 8562/2013

Diary Number

4704/2013

Order Date

02-Nov-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BENGAL STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. SECRETARY

    Adv. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SK. MOJAMMEL HAQUE

    Adv. DEEPAK GOEL[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Nov-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  4. 04-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 18-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 19-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 01-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 11-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8562/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: On 02-11-2018, the Supreme Court dismissed the State of West Bengal's Special Leave Petition challenging the High Court's order granting compassionate appointment to respondent SK. Mojammel Haque. The Court found that the respondent had already been granted the benefit of compassionate appointment during the petition's pendency, making the appeal moot. The dismissal was issued with a clarification that it should not be treated as precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case