HILLMAN TEA & TRADING CO.LTD.. vs RAFIULLA TEA INDS.PVT.LTD. . — SLP(C) No. 5569/2006

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010045552006

Filing Date

17-Feb-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5569/2006

Diary Number

4555/2006

Order Date

30-Mar-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HILLMAN TEA & TRADING CO.LTD..

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAFIULLA TEA INDS.PVT.LTD. .

    Adv. INDRA SAWHNEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 18-May-2007
  10. 18-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 02-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 23-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 20-Mar-2006
  17. 20-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Feb-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5569/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 5569/2006 - Hillman Tea & Trading Co. Ltd. v. Rafiulla Tea Industries Pvt. Ltd. The Supreme Court disposed of both special leave petitions (heard 30/03/2009) concerning a long-pending tea garden title suit originating from 1983. The suit was initially decreed ex parte in Hillman's favor (March 1993), but the decree was recalled in July 1984 after the respondent's application, restoring possession to Rafiulla. The Court directed the trial court (District Judge, Dhubri, Assam) to dispose of the revived suit by 31st December 2009. Connected contempt petitions were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case