GANESHKUMAR RAJESHWARRAO SELUKAR vs MAHENDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE — C.A. No. 9982/2024
Case under Judiciary : Appointment/termination of Chairman/ Vice-chairman/members of Statutory Tribunals [other Than Covered Under Category 40] Section III. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010452992023
Filing Date
30-10-2023 11:31 PM
Registration No
C.A. No. 009982 / 2024
Diary Number
45299/2023
Order Date
21-05-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2025 INSC 752
Disposal Type
Partly Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANESHKUMAR RAJESHWARRAO SELUKAR
Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR
Respondent(s)
MAHENDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE
Adv. ANJU THOMAS[caveat] AMRISH KUMAR[R-2] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 06-02-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 29-01-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 26-09-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 18-09-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Summary of Civil Appeal No. 9982/2024 Court Decision: The Supreme Court partly allowed Civil Appeal No. 9982/2024 and related appeals, upholding most appointments of 112 candidates made by Maharashtra to Consumer Commission posts on 05.10.2023. The Court struck down Rule 6(1) regarding Selection Committee composition (finding excessive executive dominance) and Rule 10(2) reducing tenure to 4 years (mandating 5 years minimum). The Court directed new Rules within 4 months with judicial majority in Selection Committees and clarified written examinations required only for non-judicial members, not for judicial positions like President or Judicial Members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts