UNION OF INDIA . vs MEHAR CHAND . — C.A. No. 5332/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010045132005
Filing Date
24-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5332/2014
Diary Number
4513/2005
Order Date
30-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEHAR CHAND .
Adv. RANBIR SINGH YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2005
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5332/2014
-
11-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 005332/2014 (Union of India v. Mehar Chand) On April 30, 2014, the Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging the High Court of Delhi's land compensation awards for properties acquired in villages Beharipur and Karawal Nagar for Delhi's planned development. The Court upheld the High Court's determination that market values should be Rs. 7,500-8,000 per bigha (versus the Union's proposed lower rates), finding no error in the High Court's reasoning. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts