STATE OF HARYANA . vs HET RAM . — C.A. No. 5500 - 5516/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010043912005
Filing Date
23-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5500 - 5516/2009
Diary Number
4391/2005
Order Date
29-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HET RAM .
Adv. R. C. KAUSHIK MRS. VIPIN GUPTA KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) NIDHI PREM MALHOTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
22-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5500 - 5516/2009
-
14-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: State of Haryana v. Het Ram (C.A. No. 5500-5516/2009) The Supreme Court held that work-charge service cannot be counted as regular service for ACP (Assured Career Progression) scale benefits under the 1998 Rules. The Court set aside High Court orders that had directed the State to treat work-charge employees' prior service as regular service. The distinction between work-charge and regular recruitment was deemed material; work-charge service requires no statutory selection procedure and ends upon project completion, unlike regular service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts