NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA(D) BY LRS. vs STATE OF A.P. . — SLP(C) No. 8914/2004
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010042782004
Filing Date
23-Feb-2004
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 8914/2004
Diary Number
4278/2004
Order Date
01-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA(D) BY LRS.
Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF A.P. .
Adv. C. K. SUCHARITA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2004
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8914/2004
Summary of SLP(C) No. 008914/2004 On 1 October 2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Nistala Venkataramanamma's legal representatives against the Collector, Visakhapatnam. The petitioners had sought relief under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 regarding land declared as a slum area. The High Court had dismissed their claims as premature, observing that the petitioners' ownership status depended on pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976. The Supreme Court upheld this dismissal and directed the appropriate authority to examine whether proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 could be continued or concluded, while permitting the parties to approach relevant authorities under applicable land laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts