MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER vs PARYA VARAN AVAM JANUTHAN MISSION (REGD. SOCIETY) — C.A. No. 3032/2012

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010398722009

Filing Date

24-Dec-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 3032/2012

Diary Number

39872/2009

Order Date

16-Feb-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

    Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARYA VARAN AVAM JANUTHAN MISSION (REGD. SOCIETY)

    Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-3] SUSHMA SURI[R-4] VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1] VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Feb-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  4. 28-Jan-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Jan-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  6. 19-Jan-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Dec-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3032/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003032/2012 The Supreme Court disposed of MCD's appeal challenging the 2009 High Court order restraining construction of an Indoor Basketball Stadium on Ajmal Khan Park. Since NDMC abandoned the project due to lack of funds, the Court deemed merits unnecessary. It directed competent authorities to make a fresh decision on site utilization under the new Master Plan Delhi, with prior High Court directions deemed infructuous, allowing aggrieved parties to challenge any new decision independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case