SAMIR MUKHERJEE vs DAVINDER K. BAJAJ — C.A. No. 1906/1998
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010037951998
Filing Date
03-Mar-1998
Registration No
C.A. No. 1906/1998
Diary Number
3795/1998
Order Date
18-Apr-2001
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMIR MUKHERJEE
Adv. SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
DAVINDER K. BAJAJ
Adv. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN
Orders
Summary: Samir Mukherjee v. Davinder K. Bajaj (2001) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's eviction appeal, holding that Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act (which prescribes different notice periods based on lease purpose) cannot apply to oral leases, as Section 107 mandates that year-to-year leases must be created by registered instrument only. Since no registered lease existed here, the 15-day notice for termination was valid despite the manufacturing purpose claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts