ESTATE OFFICER U.T. CHANDIGARH . vs KAILASH BANSAL . — C.A. No. 3224/2011

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010376092007

Filing Date

24-Dec-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 3224/2011

Diary Number

37609/2007

Order Date

11-Apr-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ESTATE OFFICER U.T. CHANDIGARH .

    Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAILASH BANSAL .

    Adv. YASH PAL DHINGRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Dec-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3224/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA No. 3224/2011 On 11 April 2011, the Supreme Court heard the appeal filed by the Estate Officer, U.T. Chandigarh against Kailash Bansal. The Court granted leave and allowed the appeal, setting aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order dated 21 February 2007, and dismissed Bansal's consumer complaint as not maintainable, following the decision in Civil Appeal No. 1994 of 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case