RAM BISHAL (D) THR. LRS vs DY.DIR. OF CONSOLIDATION, U.P. — C.A. No. 287/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010370352007
Filing Date
18-Dec-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 287/2010
Diary Number
37035/2007
Order Date
15-Dec-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM BISHAL (D) THR. LRS
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-4.1] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.6] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.5] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.4] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.3] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.2] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-3.1] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-1.2] RONAK KARANPURIA[P-1.1] V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-5.1] SYED MEHDI IMAM[P-5.1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.DY.DIR. OF CONSOLIDATION, U.P.
Adv. T. N. SINGH[R-3.1] T. N. SINGH[R-2.3] T. N. SINGH[R-2.2] T. N. SINGH[R-2.1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Dec-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
17-Nov-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
11-Nov-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
26-Oct-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
21-Sep-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
16-Sep-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
15-Sep-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
14-Sep-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
05-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
12-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
25-Jun-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jun-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
02-Mar-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
24-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
13-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
08-Nov-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2019
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
21-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
15-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
05-Dec-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2018
Administrative Order
Registrar (J) - II
-
16-Jul-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
-
12-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 287/2010
Case Summary: C.A. No. 287/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's confirmation (03.10.2007) of the Consolidation Officer's 1979 order regarding a land title dispute (Khata No. 207) in Uttar Pradesh. The Consolidation Officer had adjudicated the inter se dispute under Section 9-A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, determining that certain plots were ancestral property with specified co-shareholding, while others were self-acquired. Finding no factual errors warranting interference, the Court upheld the original officer's findings and dismissed all pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts