EMP.PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION vs VYAVASAYIK EVAM AUDHYOGIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD. — SLP(C) No. 37929/2012

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010366222012

Filing Date

02-Nov-2012

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 37929/2012

Diary Number

36622/2012

Order Date

06-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 10-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EMP.PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION

    Adv. GAURAV DHINGRA[P-1] GAURAV DHINGRA[P-2] GAURAV DHINGRA[P-3]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VYAVASAYIK EVAM AUDHYOGIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Nov-2017

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  4. 28-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  5. 28-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  6. 28-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  7. 01-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  8. 01-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  9. 09-May-2014

    ROPView PDF

  10. 17-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  11. 24-Jan-2014

    ROPView PDF

  12. 12-Dec-2013

    ROPView PDF

  13. 23-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Feb-2013

    ROPView PDF

  17. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 02-Nov-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 37929/2012

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 37929/2012 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation against Vyavasayik Evam Audhyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd., arising from a High Court of M.P. (Gwalior) judgment dated February 3, 2012. However, the Court kept the underlying question of law open for future consideration. Next Steps: No further hearing dates or directions were specified in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case