EXPRESSWELL INTERNATIONAL LTD. vs ADHUNIK METALIKS LTD. — ARBIT.PETITON No. 3/2006

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010036612006

Filing Date

07-Feb-2006

Registration No

ARBIT.PETITON No. 3/2006

Diary Number

3661/2006

Order Date

24-Nov-2006

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EXPRESSWELL INTERNATIONAL LTD.

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADHUNIK METALIKS LTD.

    Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Feb-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBIT.PETITON No. 3/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Expresswell International Ltd. v. Adhunik Metaliks Ltd. Outcome: Justice Altamas Kabir appointed Justice G.B. Pattanaik (former Chief Justice of India) as arbitrator to resolve the dispute, rejecting the respondent's defense that the arbitration notice was premature. The court found a valid arbitration agreement existed and that the respondent could not shield itself behind non-performance of pre-arbitration negotiation requirements. Background: Expresswell (Chinese commodity trader) contracted with Adhunik (Indian steel manufacturer) to supply 30,000 MT of coke at USD 189/MT. The contract required Adhunik to open a letter of credit 15 days before shipment (August 20-30, 2005), but Adhunik failed to do so. Expresswell invoked the arbitration clause on December 10, 2005, after failed settlement attempts. Next Steps: Arbitration proceedings to be held in Delhi, with the arbitrator guided by contract provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case