TUSHAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — SLP(C) No. 23992 - 23995/2022
Case under Consumer Disputes and Rera : Slps/writ Petitions Relating to the Real Estate (regulation and Development) Act, 2016/disputes Between Builders and Buyers �€“ Allotment, Cancellation, Fixation of Price of Flats/plots and Return of Deposits Section XI. Status: PENDING.
CNR: SCIN010344162022
Filing Date
22-10-2022 12:00 AM
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 23992 - 23995/2022
Diary Number
34416/2022
Order Date
18-10-2024
Document Type
ROP
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TUSHAR GUPTA
Adv. CHIRAG M. SHROFF
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Adv. SHREYASI KUNWAR [R-2] SHREYASI KUNWAR [R-3] SHREYASI KUNWAR [R-4] SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Mention Memo
Administrative Order
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 01-03-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 22-01-2024 | Mention Memo |
| 04-12-2023 | Administrative Order |
| 22-11-2023 | Ordinary |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: SLP(C) 23992-23995/2022 - Tushar Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date: 25 April 2024 In this Registrar's hearing, the court processed procedural matters across three connected petitions. For SLP(C) 23992-23995/2022, the court declined respondent no. 1's further opportunity to file a counter affidavit, accepted respondents 2-4's corrected counter affidavit with additional documents, and processed the petitioner's corrected rejoinder affidavit application. For SLP(C) 1625/2023, both respondent no. 1 and respondents 2-4 were denied further opportunities to file counter affidavits after failing to comply with the previous deadline. For SLP(C) 9326-9329/2023, the court noted service was complete on remaining respondents with no appearance entered, and directed the Registry to process all matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts