C.I.T.,MUMBAI vs M/S.NEHA MAD FILMS COMBINE — C.A. No. 6385/2012

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010344062008

Filing Date

26-Nov-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 6385/2012

Diary Number

34406/2008

Order Date

27-Aug-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.I.T.,MUMBAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S.NEHA MAD FILMS COMBINE

    Adv. SUJATA KURDUKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 30-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 28-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 26-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6385/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 27/08/2012, the Supreme Court heard CIT Mumbai's special leave petition against M/S Neha Mad Films Combine. The court adjourned the petition for two weeks as a final opportunity, directing the petitioner to cure a procedural defect before the next hearing. The court warned that failure to remove the defect would result in dismissal of the petition with no further adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case