RUP CHAND MAHATO vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL STATE OF BENGAL LAW DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 744/2010
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010341092008
Filing Date
25-Nov-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 744/2010
Diary Number
34109/2008
Order Date
29-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUP CHAND MAHATO
Adv. SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1] MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL STATE OF BENGAL LAW DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
28-Aug-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
27-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 744/2010
Summary: Crl.A. No. 744/2010 - Rup Chand Mahato v. State of West Bengal The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal on August 29, 2019, rejecting the appellants' argument that Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC should reduce the murder charge (Section 302) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304). The Court affirmed the concurrent findings of the two lower courts, holding the circumstances did not qualify for the exception. Bail bonds were cancelled and appellants directed to surrender to jail within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts