VIBHUTI GUDDA MINES PRIVATE LIMITED vs REDDY VEERANNA — C.A. No. 8357 - 8360/2009
Case under Mines Minerals, Mining Leases : Grant/renewal And/or Cancellation of Reconnaissance Permits, Prospecting Licenses And/or Mining Leases, Payment of Royalty Under Any Central or State Statute Section XII-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010339212009
Filing Date
06-Nov-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 8357 - 8360/2009
Diary Number
33921/2009
Order Date
12-Mar-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Data as of 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIBHUTI GUDDA MINES PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. BALAJI SRINIVASAN
Respondent(s)
REDDY VEERANNA
Adv. LAWYER S KNIT & CO PATIL REKHA CHANDRA GOUDA[R-3] PATIL REKHA CHANDRA GOUDA[R-4]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-Mar-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 11-Mar-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 26-Feb-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 25-Feb-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 19-Feb-2026 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Summary: Vibhuti Gudda Mines Private Limited v. Reddy Veeranna (C.A. 8357-8360/2009) The Supreme Court allowed Vibhuti Gudda Mines' appeals, setting aside the High Court's 2009 judgment that had quashed the mining lease grant. The Court found the High Court erred in concluding that respondent Reddy Veeranna's late application (17.04.2003) was wrongly excluded from consideration. Government records confirmed all 23 applications were properly evaluated under the Mines and Minerals Act, and Vibhuti Gudda's application was legitimately selected for its superior financial resources and capability, validated by Central Government approval dated 12.07.2005. The mining lease for 137 hectares for 20 years was accordingly reinstated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts