SURESH RAMACHANDRA NARAYAN PETHKAR vs INDIRABAI VADUDEV AURANGABAD KAR — C.A. No. 5569/2007
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010033752005
Filing Date
11-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5569/2007
Diary Number
3375/2005
Order Date
30-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH RAMACHANDRA NARAYAN PETHKAR
Adv. SHISHIR DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDIRABAI VADUDEV AURANGABAD KAR
Adv. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI A. SUBBA RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
29-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
24-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
23-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
22-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
17-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
16-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
10-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
09-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
20-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
19-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
18-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
13-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5569/2007
Summary of C.A. No. 005569/2007 The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal and held that the plaintiff's suit for specific performance was time-barred under the Limitation Act. The plaintiff sued in 1977 for mandatory injunction to enforce a 1967 property exchange agreement, but only amended the suit to claim specific performance in 1982—beyond the three-year limitation period prescribed under Article 54. The Court found the lower courts erred in dismissing the appellants' application to reject the plaint on limitation grounds, as this issue required no evidence and could be decided on admitted facts alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts