VINOD vs STATE OF M.P . — Crl.A. No. 110/2010
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010033592007
Filing Date
01-Feb-2007
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 110/2010
Diary Number
3359/2007
Order Date
06-Feb-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD
Adv. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF M.P .
Adv. MISHRA SAURABH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2007
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 110/2010
Case Summary: Vinod v. State of M.P. (Crl.A. No. 110/2010) The Supreme Court partly allowed Vinod's appeal on February 6, 2014. The Court set aside his conviction under Section 302/149 IPC (murder with common object), finding insufficient evidence that he shared a common object in causing the death of Raja Bhoj—the victim's dying declaration attributed no role to him in the murder. However, the Court upheld his convictions under Sections 148, 307/149 IPC, and Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act, supported by consistent evidence of his participation in assaulting witness PW-1 and recovery of a knife. All sentences were directed to run concurrently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts