DY.COMMR.OF I.T vs M/S CORVINE CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTL.LTD — C.A. No. 14343/2015
Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010032632012
Filing Date
27-Jan-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 14343/2015
Diary Number
3263/2012
Order Date
26-Feb-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DY.COMMR.OF I.T
Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S CORVINE CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTL.LTD
Adv. K. V. MOHAN[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Aug-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
01-Aug-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
31-Jul-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
15-Mar-2021
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai
-
12-Feb-2021
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
24-Feb-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
14-Feb-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar
-
09-Dec-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar
-
14-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2017
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
07-Mar-2017
ROPView PDF
-
06-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
06-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
06-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
19-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-Nov-2015
ROPView PDF
-
02-Nov-2015
ROPView PDF
-
14-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
14-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
14-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
06-Apr-2015
ROPView PDF
-
06-Apr-2015
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
10-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
10-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
08-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
08-Sep-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
08-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
20-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
02-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
22-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 14343/2015
-
10-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
[ 2025 INSC 743 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 14318/2015
Summary of C.A. No. 14318/2015 (Shital Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax) The Supreme Court resolved a conflicting judicial interpretation regarding Section 80-IA(9) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant company claimed deductions under both Section 80-IA and Section 80-HHC for Assessment Year 2002-03, but the tax authorities disallowed the 80-HHC deduction, arguing that Section 80-IA(9) prohibits claiming deductions under other provisions when 80-IA deduction is claimed. The Court held that Section 80-IA(9) affects the *allowability* of deductions (not their computation), meaning both deductions can be computed separately on the full gross total income, but their aggregate cannot exceed the eligible business profits—endorsing the Bombay High Court's view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts