SURAT RAM vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1366/2009
Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010323232008
Filing Date
07-Nov-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1366/2009
Diary Number
32323/2008
Order Date
27-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAT RAM
Adv. SHARMILA UPADHYAY[P-1] [Pr]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] [Gr]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
22-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
20-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
14-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
14-Mar-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
28-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1366/2009
Case Summary: Surat Ram v. The State of Himachal Pradesh Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Surat Ram's criminal appeal on August 27, 2019, upholding the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and High Court. The Court found the chain of circumstances and evidence (including identification of appellant's recovered clothes and belongings by witnesses PW-4 and PW-6) established his involvement in the crime. Directions: Bail bonds were cancelled, and the appellant was directed to surrender before the concerned jail authority within six weeks to serve the remaining sentence period. All pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts