STATE OF U.P.. vs SATISH CHATURVEDI . — C.A. No. 10872/2010

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010322702008

Filing Date

07-Nov-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 10872/2010

Diary Number

32270/2008

Order Date

15-Dec-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P..

    Adv. NIRANJANA SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISH CHATURVEDI .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Apr-2010
  9. 14-Jan-2010
  10. 01-Dec-2009
  11. 23-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Sep-2009
  13. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 15-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10872/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE OF U.P. v. SATISH CHATURVEDI (C.A. No. 010872/2010) The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's impugned order dated 17.10.2008 and allowed the State's appeal. The Court found that the High Court had passed multiple directions in a public interest litigation (filed since 1997 regarding electricity supply and cleanliness at Allahabad Medical College) that were beyond the scope of the original prayers and lacked judicial manageability—including orders on staff appointments, finance controllers, and medical shop operations. The Court directed the High Court's Division Bench to dispose of the underlying PIL within six months while adhering to proper PIL procedure guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case