RAMAPPA FAKEERAPPA CHINNANNAVAR vs UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, DHARWAD — C.A. No. 9699/2011

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010032182009

Filing Date

03-Feb-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 9699/2011

Diary Number

3218/2009

Order Date

13-Jul-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAPPA FAKEERAPPA CHINNANNAVAR

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, DHARWAD

    Adv. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jul-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  4. 08-Jul-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  5. 09-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 03-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Feb-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9699/2011

casestatus.in Summary

On 13 July 2021, the Supreme Court dismissed Ramappa Fakeerappa Chinnannavar's civil appeal against the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, finding no cogent reason to entertain the appeal and determining that the impugned judgment did not warrant interference. All pending applications were also disposed of, and the case concluded with finality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case