UNION OF INDIA . vs W.H.TARGETT (INDIA) LTD. . — SLP(C) No. 26902/2008
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010320352008
Filing Date
05-Nov-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 26902/2008
Diary Number
32035/2008
Order Date
13-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Adv. SUSHMA SURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.W.H.TARGETT (INDIA) LTD. .
Adv. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26902/2008
Summary of SLP(C) No. 26902/2008 - Union of India v. W.H. Targett (India) Ltd. The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's special leave petition challenging the Calcutta High Court's rejection of a review application. The Court upheld the High Court's jurisdiction and found the respondent's case valid on merits, noting that 90% shareholding remained with Mincing Lane Investments Ltd. before and after a name change. The Court directed the Union to implement the original 1998 judgment without further delay and vacated interim relief previously granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts