PRATAP SARNAIK . vs WAMAN NARAYAN BHAVE — C.A. No. 5318/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010031782007

Filing Date

31-Jan-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 5318/2010

Diary Number

3178/2007

Order Date

12-Jul-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATAP SARNAIK .

    Adv. GAURAV AGRAWAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WAMAN NARAYAN BHAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 25-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 28-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 30-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 31-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5318/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 005318/2010 (Pratap Sarnaik v. Waman Narayan Bhave) The Supreme Court granted leave and heard the civil appeal on 12/07/2010. The Court found that the appellants/defendants had deposited Rs. 3 lakhs and furnished a bank guarantee of Rs. 1,10,000 (totaling the decreed amount) as per an order dated 08.02.1999, entitling them to contest the matter on merits. Accordingly, the Court set aside the High Court's order and the ex-parte decree dated 12.06.1997 in Special Case No. 990 of 1994 (Second Joint Civil Judge, Thane). The appellants were permitted to file a written statement within six weeks, after which the Trial Court was directed to proceed with trial according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case