RAM GOPAL DWIVEDI vs M/S KANPUR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER — C.A. No. 8125/2009

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010317322007

Filing Date

31-Oct-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 8125/2009

Diary Number

31732/2007

Order Date

25-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 665

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM GOPAL DWIVEDI

    Adv. SATYA MITRA GARG (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S KANPUR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER

    Adv. DR. RAJEEV SHARMA DR. RAJEEV SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Jul-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre

  5. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  9. 21-Jul-2014
  10. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 11-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 31-Oct-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8125/2009

  21. [ 2017 INSC 665 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ram Gopal Dwivedi v. M/s Kanpur Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeals on July 25, 2017, upholding the High Court's judgment that had set aside the Labour Court's awards. The Court found the appellants' terminations as apprentices under the Apprentices Act, 1961 were legal and proper, as they were not entitled to protection under industrial disputes law after completing their fixed three-year training period. Key Finding: Following precedent in U.P. State Electricity Board v. Shiv Mohan Singh (2004), the Court held that apprentices who complete their contractual training period cannot claim benefits under the Industrial Disputes Act and cannot be declared "workers" entitled to reinstatement and back wages. No Further Steps: The appeals were dismissed with no directions for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case