CHETHANA vs MADHU K.C.SOMANA — T.P.(C) No. 836/2007

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010316092007

Filing Date

30-Oct-2007

Registration No

T.P.(C) No. 836/2007

Diary Number

31609/2007

Order Date

26-Jul-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHETHANA

    Adv. S. JANANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHU K.C.SOMANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 25-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 09-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 18-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 24-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Oct-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 836/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: T.P.(C) No. 836/2007 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed Chethana's transfer petition on July 26, 2010. The Hindu Marriage Act divorce petition (HMA No. Nil of 2007) filed by the husband Madhu K.C. Somana, which was pending before the Additional District Judge in Gurdaspur, Punjab, was ordered to be transferred to the Family Court at Bangalore, Karnataka. Reasoning: The petitioner (wife) established hardship grounds for transfer: she resides with elderly parents and is dependent on them, has a 2-year-old child, lacks income, has no one to accompany her to Gurdaspur for defense, and the respondent works abroad. The respondent did not contest the petition, and the Court found the circumstances warranted the transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case