THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. THR. SECRETARY vs BADRI LAL JAT — SLP(C) No. 34351/2009

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010305942009

Filing Date

07-Oct-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 34351/2009

Diary Number

30594/2009

Order Date

01-Apr-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. THR. SECRETARY

    Adv. RUCHI KOHLI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BADRI LAL JAT

    Adv. K J JOHN AND CO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  4. 08-Mar-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Mar-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  6. 18-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Feb-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  8. 01-Feb-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  9. 25-Jan-2019

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  10. 23-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre

  11. 24-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Oct-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 34351/2009

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 034351/2009 State of Rajasthan v. Badri Lal Jat (Heard 01-04-2019) The Supreme Court disposed of Rajasthan's special leave petition challenging the High Court's direction to appoint Badri Lal Jat as Physical Training Instructor (PTI) Grade III, finding that eligibility criteria had been changed during the selection process. Rather than decide the merit, the Court facilitated a settlement: the State agreed to appoint the respondent in District Chittorgarh within four weeks, without backwages, as a fresh appointment. The order was limited to this case's peculiar facts and not treated as precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case