MAHARSHI MAHESH Y.V.VISHWAVIDYALAYA vs STATE OF M.P.. — C.A. No. 333 - 341/2010
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010301922007
Filing Date
13-Oct-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 333 - 341/2010
Diary Number
30192/2007
Order Date
02-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHARSHI MAHESH Y.V.VISHWAVIDYALAYA
Adv. MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF M.P..
Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
21-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Oct-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 333 - 341/2010
-
13-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
On 2 September 2011, the Supreme Court of India heard 19 interlocutory applications filed in multiple civil appeals by Maharshi M.Y. Vedic Vishwavidyala against Narendra Kumar Saudharshan and others. The bench comprising Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Chandramauli Kr. Prasad rejected all the interlocutory applications after hearing counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts