THE STATE OF PUNJAB vs EX. RECRUIT CONSTABLE GURMAIL SINGH NO.36/169 — C.A. No. 7348/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010301522009
Filing Date
05-Oct-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 7348/2010
Diary Number
30152/2009
Order Date
19-Jul-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB
Adv. AJAY PAL[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.EX. RECRUIT CONSTABLE GURMAIL SINGH NO.36/169
Adv. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jul-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
31-May-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-May-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
-
26-Apr-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
23-Sep-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
22-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7348/2010
Case Summary: C.A. No. 007348/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Punjab's appeal against Ex. Recruit Constable Gurmail Singh on July 19, 2023, upholding the High Court's October 2008 order that confirmed the Trial Court's decree in favor of the respondent. The Court found no infirmity warranting interference and noted that the High Court had granted liberty to the appellants to conduct an enquiry under relevant Service Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts