PRAKASH SONI vs DEEPAK KUMAR . — C.A. No. 6388/2009
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010030022007
Filing Date
27-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 6388/2009
Diary Number
3002/2007
Order Date
15-Sep-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 952
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH SONI
Adv. PRATIBHA JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEEPAK KUMAR .
Adv. SHAKIL AHMED SYED (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
07-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
05-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6388/2009
-
[ 2017 INSC 952 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 006388/2009 (Prakash Soni v. Deepak Kumar) The Supreme Court allowed Dr. Prakash Soni's appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the first appellate court's order. The case involved competing claims to the retiral benefits of deceased teacher Srimati Mooli Swarnkar. The Court rejected the alleged will executed on her deathbed (18.11.2001) as surrounded by suspicious circumstances: the testator was gravely ill with liver cancer, her hands were shivering while signing, she died hours later, signatures didn't match prior documents, and nomination forms favoring respondents were executed just two days before death. The Court held that the appellant husband, as successor, is entitled to all retiral benefits including pension, gratuity, G.P.F., and insurance. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts