SWETA @ SWETA RAJ vs PATNA UNIVERSITY — C.A. No. 250/2022
Case under Section XVI. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010029762019
Filing Date
22-01-2019 02:44 PM
Registration No
C.A. No. 250/2022
Diary Number
2976/2019
Order Date
05-01-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWETA @ SWETA RAJ
Adv. SHANTANU KRISHNA
Respondent(s)
PATNA UNIVERSITY
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-2] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-3] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-4] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-5] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-6] RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-7]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
After Week/Month/Vacation
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Administrative Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-01-2022 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 02-03-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 08-01-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 22-10-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 08-05-2019 | Administrative Order |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: Sweta @ Sweta Raj v. Patna University Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals on January 5, 2022, but directed the UGC in consultation with Patna University to examine whether a "bridge period" completion methodology could facilitate recognition of the appellant's PhD degree within four months. The Court acknowledged the University's culpable conduct but held that a mandamus could not compel degree recognition since UGC regulations (effective from July 2009) were not adopted by the University until November 2012, making the appellant's pre-2012 research period non-compliant with regulations. Next Steps: UGC and the University were directed to explore alternative solutions within four months, though any such action would not create fresh grounds for litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts