M/S. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL S. CORP.LTD. vs SATISH THAPAR . — Crl.A. No. 725/2014

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010029612007

Filing Date

25-Jan-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 725/2014

Diary Number

2961/2007

Order Date

01-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL S. CORP.LTD.

    Adv. J S WAD AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISH THAPAR .

    Adv. S. JANANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Oct-2008
  11. 04-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 12-Mar-2008
  13. 07-Mar-2008
  14. 15-Feb-2008
  15. 21-Jan-2008
  16. 02-Nov-2007
  17. 05-Sep-2007
  18. 25-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 725/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. v. Satish Thapar Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted Criminal Miscellaneous No. 12230-M of 2003 back to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana for reconsideration. The Court found the High Court was unduly influenced by an earlier quashed FIR (FIR No. 86 of 1995) when evaluating a subsequent FIR (FIR No. 132 of 1996), which arose from a different transaction. The Court noted a crucial document (Form under Companies Act Section 303(2) regarding respondents' resignation from directorship on 03.04.1996) was not before the High Court, making proper examination difficult. Next Steps: The High Court was requested to hear and decide the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case