EMPLOYERS OF M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LTD vs WORKMEN, BIHAR COLLIERY KAMGAR UNION — C.A. No. 6226/2012

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010288592006

Filing Date

08-Nov-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 6226/2012

Diary Number

28859/2006

Order Date

24-Apr-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EMPLOYERS OF M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LTD

    Adv. SUNIL ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WORKMEN, BIHAR COLLIERY KAMGAR UNION

    Adv. SHARMILA UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 20-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 26-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Nov-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6226/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 006226 / 2012 On 24/04/2012, the Supreme Court heard the consolidated Special Leave to Appeal petitions filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd's employers against the workmen union. The Court found the petitioner's affidavit deficient in material particulars and granted four weeks for filing a better and detailed affidavit after serving copies on the respondent, who was permitted to file a reply affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case